An experiment to measure learning in a collaborative assessment environment

Authors:
Ricardo Conejo;Beatriz Barros;Eduardo Guzman;Jaime Galvez
Affiliations:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, 35, 29071 Malaga;Universidad de Málaga, Spain, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, 35, 29071 Malaga;Universidad de Málaga, Spain, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, 35, 29071 Malaga;Universidad de Málaga, Spain, Boulevard Louis Pasteur, 35, 29071 Malaga
Venue:
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling
Year:
2009

Citing 5
Cited 1

EVA: an interactive web-based collaborative learning environment

Computers & Education - Special section on multimedia in engineering education
Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning

CSCL '05 Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!
Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentation

CSCL '99 Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning
SIETTE: A Web-Based Tool for Adaptive Testing

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Measuring the Effect of Collaboration in an Assessment Environment

Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts That Work

Collaborative assessment with SIETTE

Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The SIETTE collaborative environment allows students to take tests together in small groups. Individuals can communicate and hold discussions to solve test questions. This paper describes the summative evaluation of the SIETTE collaborative environment and the relationship between the collaboration and the actual improvement which occurs in the student knowledge level. We conclude that under certain conditions improvement occurs and can be measured.