Heuristic reasoning about uncertainty: an artificial intelligence approach
Heuristic reasoning about uncertainty: an artificial intelligence approach
Knowledge, decision making, and uncertainty
Artificial intelligence and statistics
Conceptual retrieval and case law
ICAIL '87 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Defeasible reasoning and decision support systems
Decision Support Systems
A logical framework for default reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Representing the structure of a legal argument
ICAIL '89 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A logical framework for modelling legal argument
ICAIL '93 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Types of expertise: an invariant of problem solving
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
The Pleadings Game: an exercise in computational dialectics
Artificial Intelligence and Law
Burden of proof in legal argumentation
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The split-up system: integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The Zeno argumentation framework
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Progress on Room 5: a testbed for public interactive semi-formal legal argumentation
Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
On hypermedia-based argumentation decision support systems
Decision Support Systems - Special issue: logic modeling
Automated argument assistance for lawyers
ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Interfacing between Lawyers and Computers: An Architecture for Knowledge-Based Interfaces to Legal Databases
Collaborative Decision Making: A Connectionist Paradigm for Dialectical Support
Information Systems Research
A conceptual, case-relation representation of text for intelligent retrieval
A conceptual, case-relation representation of text for intelligent retrieval
Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Rule Based Expert Systems: The Mycin Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (The Addison-Wesley series in artificial intelligence)
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Structured reasoning to support deliberative dialogue
KES'05 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems - Volume Part I
That is your evidence?: Classifying stance in online political debate
Decision Support Systems
Argumentation and intuitive decision making: criminal sentencing and sentence indication
AICOL'11 Proceedings of the 25th IVR Congress conference on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: models and ethical challenges for legal systems, legal language and legal ontologies, argumentation and software agents
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we present a model of reasoning called the generic/actual argument model (GAAM). Reasoning within a discursive community can be represented with this model so that participant claims can be accommodated without recourse to combative metaphors such as attack or defeat. The model facilitates the comprehension of complex reasoning for humans as well as being a computational representation for machine modelling of reasoning. As such, the model naturally integrates machine inferences with human. The model has been the basis for the development of practical systems to support reasoning and deliberation in areas of law and organizational decision making. Here, we present a formal description of the model and identify some of its characteristics.