An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
An artificial intelligence approach to legal reasoning
A logical framework for default reasoning
Artificial Intelligence
An abductive theory of legal issues
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - AI and legal reasoning. Part 2
Argument moves in a rule-guided domain
ICAIL '91 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A tool in modelling disagreement in law: preferring the most specific argument
ICAIL '91 Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
Artificial Intelligence
Understanding precedents in a temporal context of evolving legal doctrine
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Burden of proof in legal argumentation
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The systematization of legal meta-inference
ICAIL '95 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Nonmonotonic Reasoning as Prioritized Argumentation
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Induction of defeasible logic theories in the legal domain
ICAIL '03 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning
Decision Support Systems
Embedding defeasible logic into logic programming
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Argumentation in AI and law: editors' introduction
Artificial Intelligence and Law - Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law
Discordance Detection in Regional Ordinance: Ontology-based Validation
Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference
Logic Programming with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
ICLP '09 Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Logic Programming
The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning
Decision Support Systems
Support in Abstract Argumentation
Proceedings of the 2010 conference on Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010
From abstract to concrete norms in agent institutions
FAABS'04 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems
Open texture and argumentation: what makes an argument persuasive?
Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper investigates the relevance of the logical study of argumentation systems for AI-and-law research, in particular for modelling the adversarial aspect of legal reasoning. It does so in applying the argumentation framework of Prakken (1993a/b) to the legal domain. Three elements of the framework are particularly illustrated: firstly, its generality, in that it leaves room for any standard for comparing pairs of arguments; secondly, its ability to model the combined use of these standards; and finally, its relevance for modelling metalevel reasoning. These three features make the framework suitable as a logical framework for any theory of legal argument.