Structured reasoning to support deliberative dialogue

Authors:
Alyx Macfadyen;Andrew Stranieri;John Yearwood
Affiliations:
Centre for Informatics and Applied Optimization, University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia;Centre for Informatics and Applied Optimization, University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia;Centre for Informatics and Applied Optimization, University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Venue:
KES'05 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems - Volume Part I
Year:
2005

Citing 9
Cited 0

The integration of retrieval, reasoning and drafting for refugee law: a third generation legal knowledge based system

ICAIL '99 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols

Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1
Optimal agendas for multi-issue negotiation

AAMAS '03 Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Democracy in open agent systems

AAMAS '03 Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning

The Knowledge Engineering Review
A Denotational Semantics for Deliberation Dialogues

AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1
Locutions for Argumentation in Agent Interaction Protocols

AAMAS '04 Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Argumentation and Game Theory to Develop an Online Dispute Resolution Environment

ICTAI '04 Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
The generic/actual argument model of practical reasoning

Decision Support Systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Deliberative dialogue is a form of dialogue that involves participants advancing claims and, without power plays or posturing, deliberating on the claims of others until a consensus decision is reached. This paper describes a deliberative support system to facilitate and encourage participants to engage in a discussion deliberatively. A knowledge representation framework is deployed to generate a strong domain model of reasoning structure. The structure, coupled with a deliberative dialogue protocol results in a web based system that regulates a discussion to avoid combative, non-deliberative exchanges. The system has been designed for online dispute resolution between husband and wife in divorce proceedings involving property.