Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic networks
Artificial Intelligence
Probabilistic reasoning in decision support systems: from computation to common sense
Probabilistic reasoning in decision support systems: from computation to common sense
Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks
AAAI'93 Proceedings of the eleventh national conference on Artificial intelligence
Enhancing QPNs for trade-off resolution
UAI'99 Proceedings of the Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
From qualitative to quantitative probabilistic networks
UAI'02 Proceedings of the Eighteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Elicitation of probabilities for belief networks: combining qualitative and quantitative information
UAI'95 Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Intercausal reasoning with uninstantiated ancestor nodes
UAI'93 Proceedings of the Ninth international conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Probabilities for a probabilistic network: a case study in oesophageal cancer
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Inference in qualitative probabilistic networks revisited
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Surprise-Based Qualitative Probabilistic Networks
ECSQARU '09 Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
Qualitative probabilistic networks with reduced ambiguities
Applied Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A qualitative probabilistic network is a graphical model of the probabilistic influences among a set of statistical variables, in which each influence is associated with a qualitative sign. A non-monotonic influence between two variables is associated with the ambiguous sign '?', which indicates that the actual sign of the influence depends on the state of the network. The presence of such ambiguous signs is undesirable as it tends to lead to uninformative results upon inference. In this paper, we argue that, although a non-monotonic influence may have varying effects, in each specific state of the network, its effect is unambiguous. To capture the current effect of the influence, we introduce the concept of situational sign. We show how situational signs can be used upon inference and how they are updated as the state of the network changes. By means of a real-life qualitative network in oncology, we show that the use of situational signs can effectively forestall uninformative results upon inference.