Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics
Autonomous robot vehicles
Globally Consistent Range Scan Alignment for Environment Mapping
Autonomous Robots
Benchmarking urban six-degree-of-freedom simultaneous localization and mapping
Journal of Field Robotics
Robust and efficient robotic mapping
Robust and efficient robotic mapping
IJCAI'03 Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence
On measuring the accuracy of SLAM algorithms
Autonomous Robots
Improved Techniques for Grid Mapping With Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filters
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
From Sensors to Human Spatial Concepts: An Annotated Data Set
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
On measuring the accuracy of SLAM algorithms
Autonomous Robots
RoboCupRescue Interleague Challenge 2009: bridging the gap between simulation and reality
PerMIS '09 Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems
Mapping for the Support of First Responders in Critical Domains
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems
Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we address the problem of creating an objective benchmark for comparing SLAM approaches. We propose a framework for analyzing the results of SLAM approaches based on a metric for measuring the error of the corrected trajectory. The metric uses only relative relations between poses and does not rely on a global reference frame. The idea is related to graph-based SLAM approaches in the sense that it considers the energy needed to deform the trajectory estimated by a SLAM approach to the ground truth trajectory. Our method enables us to compare SLAM approaches that use different estimation techniques or different sensor modalities since all computations are made based on the corrected trajectory of the robot. We provide sets of relative relations needed to compute our metric for an extensive set of datasets frequently used in the SLAM community. The relations have been obtained by manually matching laser-range observations. We believe that our benchmarking framework allows the user an easy analysis and objective comparisons between different SLAM approaches.