Communications of the ACM - Special issue: Soviet computing
Scheduled supervised laboratories in CS1: a comparative analysis
SIGCSE '93 Proceedings of the twenty-fourth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
CSI closed lab vs. open lab experiment
SIGCSE '94 Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education
Integrating technology into computer science examinations
SIGCSE '98 Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
On changing from written to on-line tests in Computer Science I: an assessment
ITiCSE '99 Proceedings of the 4th annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Open lab vs. closed lab: Computer Programming I at Mississippi State University
SIGCSE '85 Proceedings of the sixteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Using lab practica to evaluate programming ability
Proceedings of the thirty-second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education
Experience with a computer-assisted formal programming examination
Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Testing skills and knowledge: introducing a laboratory exam in CS1
SIGCSE '02 Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Effectiveness of online assessment
SIGCSE '03 Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
The effect of closed labs in computer science I: an assessment
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Analyzing relationships between closed labs and course activities in CS1
ITiCSE '05 Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Is CS1 better with the same lecture and lab instructor?
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
The effects of pair-programming on individual programming skill
Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Designing and implementing unsupervised online database labs
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The majority of earlier studies have found no positive effect of closed labs on student performance or retention in Computer Science I. Since these studies used written tests to assess student performance, their results may have been affected by a mismatch between what was taught in closed labs and what was assessed in the written test. On the other hand, online tests that involve writing and debugging programs assess the very knowledge and skills taught in closed labs. So, we conducted a study to evaluate the effect of closed labs on student performance and retention when they are combined with online testing in the course. We found that even with online testing, closed labs did not significantly affect either the total score of the students in the course or retention in the course. On the other hand, students with closed or even optional labs scored significantly better on their online first test than students with open labs scored on their written first test. Since this is in spite of the fact that online tests are more stressful to students than written tests, closed labs helped students prepare for online tests. Closed labs, when combined with online testing, helped significantly improve the course performance of above-average students. Finally, there was significant and large correlation between Math SAT score and student performance in Computer Science I.