Proving ptolemy right: the environment abstraction framework for model checking concurrent systems

  • Authors:

  • Edmund Clarke;Murali Talupur;Helmut Veith

  • Affiliations:

  • School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University;Intel Strategic CAD Labs, Portland;Fachbereich Informatik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany and Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, Germany

  • Venue:
  • TACAS'08/ETAPS'08 Proceedings of the Theory and practice of software, 14th international conference on Tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The parameterized verification of concurrent algorithms and protocols has been addressed by a variety of recent methods. Experience shows that there is a trade-off between techniques which are widely applicable but depend on nontrivial human guidance, and fully automated approaches which are tailored for narrow classes of applications. In this spectrum, we propose a new framework based on environment abstraction which exhibits a large degree of automation and can be easily adjusted to different fields of application. Our approach is based on two insights: First, we argue that natural abstractions for concurrent software are derived from the "Ptolemaic" perspective of a human engineer who focuses on a single reference process. For this class of abstractions, we demonstrate soundness of abstraction under very general assumptions. Second, most protocols in given a class of protocols - for instance, cache coherence protocols and mutual exclusion protocols - can be modeled by small sets of compound statements. These two insights allow to us efficiently build precise abstract models for given protocols which can then be model checked. We demonstrate the power of our method by applying it to various well known classes of protocols.