Long-distance scrambling and tree adjoining grammars
EACL '91 Proceedings of the fifth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Formal aspects and parsing issues of dependency theory
COLING '98 Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2
Converting dependency structures to phrase structures
HLT '01 Proceedings of the first international conference on Human language technology research
The Penn Treebank: annotating predicate argument structure
HLT '94 Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology
A multi-representational and multi-layered treebank for Hindi/Urdu
ACL-IJCNLP '09 Proceedings of the Third Linguistic Annotation Workshop
Inspecting the structural biases of dependency parsing algorithms
CoNLL '10 Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
Evaluating dependency parsing: robust and heuristics-free cross-nnotation evaluation
EMNLP '11 Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Cross-framework evaluation for statistical parsing
EACL '12 Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Data-driven parsing using probabilistic linear context-free rewriting systems
Computational Linguistics
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
There are many misconceptions about dependency representations and phrase structure representations for syntax. They are partly due to terminological confusion, partly due to a lack of meta-scientific clarity about the roles of representations and linguistic theories. This opinion piece argues for a simple but clear view of syntactic representation.