Cognitive effectiveness of visual instructional design languages

  • Authors:
  • Kathrin Figl;Michael Derntl;Manuel Caeiro Rodriguez;Luca Botturi

  • Affiliations:
  • WU-Vienna University of Economics and Business, Institute for Information Systems & New Media, UZAII, Augasse 2-6, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;University of Vienna, Faculty of Computer Science, Austria;Department of Telematic Engineering, University of Vigo, Spain;Dipartimento Formazione e Apprendimento-SUPSI, Switzerland

  • Venue:
  • Journal of Visual Languages and Computing
  • Year:
  • 2010

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The introduction of learning technologies into education is making the design of courses and instructional materials an increasingly complex task. Instructional design languages are identified as conceptual tools for achieving more standardized and, at the same time, more creative design solutions, as well as enhancing communication and transparency in the design process. In this article we discuss differences in cognitive aspects of three visual instructional design languages (E^2ML, PoEML, coUML), based on user evaluation. Cognitive aspects are of relevance for learning a design language, creating models with it, and understanding models created using it. The findings should enable language constructors to improve the usability of visual instructional design languages in the future. The paper concludes with directions with regard to how future research on visual instructional design languages could strengthen their value and enhance their actual use by educators and designers by synthesizing existing efforts into a unified modeling approach for VIDLs.