Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison
ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
Split menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Direct manipulation vs. interface agents
interactions
Too much of a good thing?: identifying and resolving bloat in the user interface
ACM SIGCHI Bulletin
A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Ephemeral adaptation: the use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper we investigate empirically the effects of menu size on the personalisation approaches. Therefore, we investigate empirically the use of different size of five different interactive menu conditions: adaptable, adaptive split, adaptive/adaptable highlighted, adaptive/adaptable minimised and mixed-initiative menus. The aim of the study is to find out the effect of menu sized on the user satisfaction of these five menus. Results shows that in overall, in small menus, the minimised condition was the most preferable one, followed by the adaptable, and highlighted menus. By contrast, the adaptive split and mixed-initiative approach were selected as the most undesirable menus. On the other hand, in large menus, the mixed-initiative condition was the most preferable one, followed by the minimised approach. In contrast, the adaptable menu was the most unwanted menu followed by the adaptive split menu.