Robots: Fact, Fiction, and Prediction
Robots: Fact, Fiction, and Prediction
Explaining effects of eye gaze on mediated group conversations:: amount or synchronization?
CSCW '02 Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Motion planning for hand-over between human and robot
IROS '95 Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems-Volume 1 - Volume 1
Common metrics for human-robot interaction
Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction
Dynamic movement and positioning of embodied agents in multiparty conversations
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Robot social presence and gender: do females view robots differently than males?
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
Evaluating the ICRA 2008 HRI challenge
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
Creating Brain-Like Intelligence
Journal of Field Robotics - Three-Dimensional Mapping, Part 2
Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS)
Meet me where i'm gazing: how shared attention gaze affects human-robot handover timing
Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Ensuring that a particular and unsuspecting member of a group is the recipient of a salient-item hand-over is a complicated interaction. The robot must effectively, expediently and reliably communicate its intentions to advert any tendency within the group towards antinormative behaviour. In this paper, we study how a robot can establish the participant roles of such an interaction using imitated social and contextual cues. We designed two gaze cues, the first was designed to discourage antinormative behaviour through individualising a particular member of the group and the other to the contrary. We designed and conducted a field experiment (456 participants in 64 trials) in which small groups of people (between 3 and 20 people) assembled in front of the robot, which then attempted to pass a salient object to a particular group member by presenting a physical cue, followed by one of two variations of a gaze cue. Our results showed that presenting the individualising cue had a significant (z=3.733, p=0.0002) effect on the robot's ability to ensure that an arbitrary group member did not take the salient object and that the selected participant did.