Small Sample Size Effects in Statistical Pattern Recognition: Recommendations for Practitioners
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Automatic Classification of Single Facial Images
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Neural Network Perception for Mobile Robot Guidance
Neural Network Perception for Mobile Robot Guidance
Self-Organizing Maps
Concurrent Self-Organizing Maps for Pattern Classification
ICCI '02 Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics
Coding Facial Expressions with Gabor Wavelets
FG '98 Proceedings of the 3rd. International Conference on Face & Gesture Recognition
Training of Classifiers Using Virtual Samples Only
ICPR '04 Proceedings of the Pattern Recognition, 17th International Conference on (ICPR'04) Volume 3 - Volume 03
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics)
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics)
k-nearest neighbors directed noise injection in multilayer perceptron training
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
GAVTASC'11 Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on Signal processing, computational geometry and artificial vision, and Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS international conference on Systems theory and scientific computation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper is dedicated to the improvement of a pattern classifier generalization performances. One proposes the increasing of the training set size, by means of "virtual" sample generation using a set of concurrent self-organizing maps (VSG-CSOM). We have evaluated the above proposed model for facial expression recognition. One uses Japanese female facial expression (JAFFE) database corresponding to seven emotion classes: happiness, sadness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear and neutral face. We have considered the following classifiers: nearest neighbour (NN), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and radial basis function (RBF) neural classifier. One obtains an obvious improvement in generalization performances for all the considered statistical/neural classifiers. For example, the recognition score evaluated on the test set as a consequence of virtual sample generation increases for the MLP from 67.14 % to 92.86 % and for the RBF from 87.14 % to 94.29 %.