Open source software licenses: Strong-copyleft, non-copyleft, or somewhere in between?

  • Authors:
  • Ravi Sen;Chandrasekar Subramaniam;Matthew L. Nelson

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Information and Operations Management, Texas A&M University, United States;Department of Business Information Systems and Operations Management, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, United States;Department of Accounting and Business Information Systems, Illinois State University, United States

  • Venue:
  • Decision Support Systems
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Studies on open source software (OSS) have shown that the license under which an OSS is released has an impact on the success or failure of the software. In this paper, we model the relationship between an OSS developer's utility, the effort that goes into developing an OSS, his attitude towards the freedom to choose an OSS license, and the choice of OSS license. We find that the larger the effort to develop OSS, the more is the likelihood that the OSS license would be free from restrictions. Interestingly, the result holds even when all OSS developers prefer restrictive licenses or less-restrictive license. The results suggest that least-restrictive or non-copyleft license will dominate other types of OSS license when a large effort is required to develop derivative software. On the other hand, most-restrictive or strong-copyleft licenses will be the dominant license when minimal effort is required to develop the original OSS and the derivative software.