How do learners respond to pedagogical agents that deliver social-oriented non-task messages? Impact on student learning, perceptions, and experiences

Authors:
George Veletsianos
Affiliations:
University of Texas at Austin, College of Education, Instructional Technology, United States
Venue:
Computers in Human Behavior
Year:
2012

Citing 6
Cited 1

The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places

The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places
Learning technologies: affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning

Computers & Education
When sex, drugs, and violence enter the classroom: Conversations between adolescents and a female pedagogical agent

Interacting with Computers
Benefits of Virtual Characters in Computer Based Learning Environments: Claims and Evidence

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces

Computers in Human Behavior
Engagement vs. Deceit: Virtual Humans with Human Autobiographies

IVA '09 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents

Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course

Computers & Education

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper, I investigate the impact of non-task pedagogical agent behavior on learning outcomes, perceptions of agents' interaction ability, and learner experiences. Quasi-experimental results indicate that while the addition of non-task comments to an on-task tutorial may increase learning and perceptions of the agent's ability to interact with learners, this increase is not statistically significant. Further addition of non-task comments however, harms learning and perceptions of the agent's ability to interact with learners in statistically significant ways. Qualitative results reveal that on-task interactions are efficient but impersonal, while non-task interactions were memorable, but distracting. Implications include the potential for non-task interactions to create an uncanny valley effect for agent behavior.