Communications of the ACM
Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications
ETRA '02 Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search
Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Personalized web exploration with task models
Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web
Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the subdocument level
Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Personalized recommendation on dynamic content using predictive bilinear models
Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web
Segment-level display time as implicit feedback: a comparison to eye tracking
Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
MM '09 Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on Multimedia
Can eyes reveal interest? Implicit queries from gaze patterns
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Inferring word relevance from eye-movements of readers
Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
Large-scale validation and analysis of interleaved search evaluation
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Human behavior sensing for tag relevance assessment
Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We explore the use of eye movements as a source of implicit relevance feedback information. We construct a controlled information retrieval experiment where the relevance of each text is known, and test usefulness of implicit relevance feedback with it. If perceived relevance of a text can be predicted from eye movements, eye movement signal must contain information on the relevance. The result is that relevance can be predicted to a considerable extent with discriminative hidden Markov models, and clearly better than randomly already with simple linear models of time-averaged data.