Does zooming improve image browsing?
Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries
Communications of the ACM
PhotoMesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps
Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
An eye tracking approach to image search activities using RSVP display techniques
AVI '08 Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
Improving visual search with image segmentation
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Towards Standardized Pen-Based Annotation of Breast Cancer Findings
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part IV: Interacting in Various Application Domains
Gaze as a supplementary modality for interacting with ambient intelligence environments
UAHCI'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Universal access in human-computer interaction: ambient interaction
Visual search in dynamic 3D visualisations of unstructured picture collections
Interacting with Computers
Speed-accuracy trade-off in dwell-based eye pointing tasks at different cognitive levels
Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on pervasive eye tracking & mobile eye-based interaction
Predicting where we look from spatiotemporal gaps
Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
We report an experimental study that aims at investigating the influence of spatial layout on visual search efficiency and comfort. 4 layouts were used for displaying 120 scenes comprising 30 realistic colour photos each: random, elliptic, radial and matrix-like. Scenes (30 per structure) were presented to 5 participants who had to select a pre-viewed photo in each scene using the mouse. Eye-tracking data indicate that elliptic layouts provided better visual comfort than any of the other layouts (shortest scan paths), and proved to be more efficient than matrix layouts (shorter search times). These results are statistically significant (paired t-tests).