A topological characterization of thinning
Theoretical Computer Science
Discrete Applied Mathematics
On topology preservation in 3D thinning
CVGIP: Image Understanding
Detection of 3-D Simple Points for Topology Preserving Transformations with Application to Thinning
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
A Boolean characterization of three-dimensional simple points
Pattern Recognition Letters
Handbook of combinatorics (vol. 2)
Connectivity in Digital Pictures
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Geometry of Digital Spaces
Minimal non-simple sets in 4D binary images
Graphical Models - Special issue: Discrete topology and geometry for image and object representation
Strongly normal sets of contractible tiles in N dimensions
Pattern Recognition
Minimal non-simple sets in 4-dimensional binary images with (8,80)-adjacency
IWCIA'04 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Combinatorial Image Analysis
Two-Dimensional Parallel Thinning Algorithms Based on Critical Kernels
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Minimal non-deletable sets and minimal non-codeletable sets in binary images
Theoretical Computer Science
On Parallel Thinning Algorithms: Minimal Non-simple Sets, P-simple Points and Critical Kernels
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
DGCI'08 Proceedings of the 14th IAPR international conference on Discrete geometry for computer imagery
Powerful Parallel and Symmetric 3D Thinning Schemes Based on Critical Kernels
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The concepts of weak component and simple 1 are generalizations, to binary images on the n-cells of n-dimensional cell complexes, of the standard concepts of “26-component” and “26-simple” 1 in binary images on the 3-cells of a 3D cubical complex; the concepts of strong component and cosimple 1 are generalizations of the concepts of “6-component” and “6-simple” 1 Over the past 20 years, the problems of determining just which sets of 1's can be minimal non-simple, just which sets can be minimal non-cosimple, and just which sets can be minimal non-simple (minimal non-cosimple) without being a weak (strong) foreground component have been solved for the 2D cubical and hexagonal, 3D cubical and face-centered-cubical, and 4D cubical complexes This paper solves these problems in much greater generality, for a very large class of cell complexes of dimension ≤4.