Discrete Applied Mathematics
On topology preservation in 3D thinning
CVGIP: Image Understanding
Connectivity in Digital Pictures
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Topology-Preserving Deletion of 1's from 2-, 3- and 4-Dimensional Binary Images
DGCI '97 Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Discrete Geometry for Computer Imagery
Strongly normal sets of contractible tiles in N dimensions
Pattern Recognition
Two-Dimensional Parallel Thinning Algorithms Based on Critical Kernels
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Minimal non-deletable sets and minimal non-codeletable sets in binary images
Theoretical Computer Science
Minimal Simple Pairs in the 3-D Cubic Grid
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Skeletal curves of 3D astrocyte samples
Machine Graphics & Vision International Journal
On Parallel Thinning Algorithms: Minimal Non-simple Sets, P-simple Points and Critical Kernels
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
An introduction to simple sets
Pattern Recognition Letters
DGCI'08 Proceedings of the 14th IAPR international conference on Discrete geometry for computer imagery
Minimal simple pairs in the cubic grid
DGCI'08 Proceedings of the 14th IAPR international conference on Discrete geometry for computer imagery
Minimal non-simple sets in 4-dimensional binary images with (8,80)-adjacency
IWCIA'04 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Combinatorial Image Analysis
Minimal non-simple and minimal non-cosimple sets in binary images on cell complexes
DGCI'06 Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Discrete Geometry for Computer Imagery
Hi-index | 0.00 |
One way to verify that a proposed parallel thinning algorithm "preserves topology" is to check that no iteration can ever delete a minimal non-simple ("MNS") set. This is a practical verification method because few types of set can be MNS without being a component. Ronse, Hall, Ma, and the authors have solved the problem of finding all such types of set for 2D and 3D Cartesian grids, 2D hexagonal grids, and 3D face-centered cubic grids. Here we solve this problem for a 4D Cartesian grid, in the case where 80-adjacency is used on 1's and 8-adjacency on 0's.