Considering failure: eight years of ITID research

  • Authors:

  • Leslie L. Dodson;S. Revi Sterling;John K. Bennett

  • Affiliations:

  • University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO;University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO;University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper examines forty articles published in the journal Information Technologies & International Development between 2003 and 2010 in an effort to identify commonalities among projects that failed to meet some or all of their development objectives. We considered whether the selected papers articulated clear development objectives, and whether baseline data was used to inform project design. We then considered two factors associated with how development objectives are implemented: the development perspective (top-down vs. bottom-up), and the project focus (the technology vs. the community). Our goal was not to find fault with our colleagues or their work, rather to advance the debate about the effectiveness of ICTD initiatives at a particularly important point in the history of the discipline. We conclude that top-down, technology-centric, goal-diffuse approaches to ICTD contribute to unsatisfactory development results. Careful consideration of development objectives, perspective and focus is essential in all phases of an ICTD project, from design to deployment. Honest and comprehensive reporting of failure (and success) helps ICTD researchers and practitioners focus on best practices in meeting critical development needs.