The dominant robot: threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals

Authors:
M. A. J. Roubroeks;J. R. C. Ham;C. J. H. Midden
Affiliations:
Department of Human-Technology Interaction, Eindhoven University of Technology;Department of Human-Technology Interaction, Eindhoven University of Technology;Department of Human-Technology Interaction, Eindhoven University of Technology
Venue:
PERSUASIVE'10 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Persuasive Technology
Year:
2010

Citing 2
Cited 2

The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places

The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places
Does it make a difference who tells you what to do?: exploring the effect of social agency on psychological reactance

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology

Rhetorical robots: making robots more effective speakers using linguistic cues of expertise

Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
On Being a Peer: What Persuasive Technology for Teaching Can Gain from Social Robotics in Education

International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Persuasive technology can take the form of a social agent that persuades people to change behavior or attitudes. However, like any persuasive technology, persuasive social agents might trigger psychological reactance, which can lead to restoration behavior. The current study investigated whether interacting with a persuasive robot can cause psychological reactance. Additionally, we investigated whether goal congruency plays a role in psychological reactance. Participants programmed a washing machine while a robot gave threatening advice. Confirming expectations, participants experienced more psychological reactance when receiving high-threatening advice compared to low-threatening advice. Moreover, when the robot gave high-threatening advice and expressed an incongruent goal, participants reported the highest level of psychological reactance (on an anger measure). Finally, high-threatening advice led to more restoration, and this relationship was partially mediated by psychological reactance. Overall, results imply that under certain circumstances persuasive technology can trigger opposite effects, especially when people have incongruent goal intentions.