Government: a better ballot box?
IEEE Spectrum - The amazing vanishing transistor act
Electronic voting system usability issues
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A Practical Secret Voting Scheme for Large Scale Elections
ASIACRYPT '92 Proceedings of the Workshop on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques: Advances in Cryptology
Revisiting Legal and Regulatory Requirements for Secure E-Voting
SEC '02 Proceedings of the IFIP TC11 17th International Conference on Information Security: Visions and Perspectives
Procedural Security in Electronic Voting
HICSS '04 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 5 - Volume 5
Why use an open source e-voting system?
ITiCSE '05 Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
The Blaster Worm: Then and Now
IEEE Security and Privacy
Hack-a-Vote: Security Issues with Electronic Voting Systems
IEEE Security and Privacy
Secret-Ballot Receipts: True Voter-Verifiable Elections
IEEE Security and Privacy
Measuring similarity of large software systems based on source code correspondence
PROFES'05 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement
A practical voter-verifiable election scheme
ESORICS'05 Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Research in Computer Security
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Electronic voting has the potential to be the most reliable, secure and trustworthy form of voting implemented. Digital technology, complete with error correction, robust storage and cryptographic security offers the possibility to record, transmit, store and tabulate votes far more reliably than paper. While current implementations of electronic voting have been susceptible to various failures, electronic voting itself is not fundamentally flawed. The Secure Architecture for Voting Electronically (SAVE) is one proposed architecture for mitigating security and trust issues with the voting process. In addition, the architecture enables academics, small companies and organizations to easily and cheaply build their own modules conforming to the standard.