Reflections on software engineering 2004, the ACM/IEEE-CS guidelines for undergraduate programs in software engineering

Authors:
Joanne M. Atlee;Richard J. LeBlanc;Timothy C. Lethbridge;Ann Sobel;J. Barrie Thompson
Affiliations:
University of Waterloo, Canada;Georgia Institute of Technology;University of Ottawa, Canada;Miami University;University of Sunderland, United Kingdom
Venue:
ICSE'05 Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on Software Engineering Education in the Modern Age
Year:
2005

Citing 6
Cited 2

What Knowledge Is Important to a Software Professional?

Computer
The Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge

IEEE Software
Software engineering education (SEEd)

ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
After the Gold Rush: Establishing a True Profession of Software Engineering

CSEET '01 Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training
Teaching Ethics in the Software Engineering Curriculum

CSEET '03 Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training
A Further Exploration of Teaching Ethics in the Software Engineering Curriculum

CSEET '04 Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training

Improving software practice through education: Challenges and future trends

FOSE '07 2007 Future of Software Engineering
Exploring Experienced Professionals’ Reflections on Computing Education

ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper is a collection of reflections on some of the curricular decisions made in “Software Engineering 2004,” the Software Engineering volume of the Computing Curricula 2001 project. We briefly describe the contents of the Volume and the process used in developing the Volume's guidelines. We then look in more detail at the rationale behind some of the more controversial decisions made. We conclude with how we expect the Volume to be used in practice.