Comparison of Physical and Software-Implemented Fault Injection Techniques
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Evaluation of SET and SEU Effects at Multiple Abstraction Levels
IOLTS '05 Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium
Evaluating the Effects of Transient Faults on Vehicle Dynamic Performance in Automotive Systems
ITC '04 Proceedings of the International Test Conference on International Test Conference
Fault-Robust Microcontrollers for Automotive Applications
IOLTS '06 Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on On-Line Testing
Analyzing Fault Susceptibility of ABS Microcontroller
SAFECOMP '08 Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security
Actuator Fault Tolerance in Control Systems with Predictive Constrained Set-Point Optimizers
International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science - Issues in Fault Diagnosis and Fault Tolerant Control
Fault Injection Techniques and Tools for Embedded Systems Reliability Evaluation
Fault Injection Techniques and Tools for Embedded Systems Reliability Evaluation
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The paper deals with the problem of evaluating fault robustness of the software implemented Dynamic Matrix Control (DMC) Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithms. Numerical and explicit implementations of the DMC algorithms are considered. It is shown that faults affecting the algorithms can provoke undesirable behaviour or even destabilize the process. Dependability was evaluated experimentally using two different software implemented fault injection approaches, the old one (FITS) and a new one (InBochs). FITS was not sufficient in case of the numerical DMC implementation. InBochs is based on the system emulator and delivers the same level of functionality as FITS while having capability to extend fault models.