Integrating accessibility into the computer science curriculum
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Programmer-focused website accessibility evaluations
Proceedings of the 7th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Flexible tool support for accessibility evaluation
Interacting with Computers
Accessibility 2.0: people, policies and processes
W4A '07 Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)
A comparative test of web accessibility evaluation methods
Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
A framework for filtering web accessibility guidelines
Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A)
Validity and reliability of web accessibility guidelines
Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Including accessibility within and beyond undergraduate computing courses
Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
How much does expertise matter?: a barrier walkthrough study with experts and non-experts
Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Accessibility guidelines management framework
UAHCI'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Universal access in human-computer interaction: applications and services
Analysis and integration of web accessibility metrics
Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)
On the testability of WCAG 2.0 for beginners
Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)
An educational tool to support the accessibility evaluation process
Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A)
Testability and validity of WCAG 2.0: the expertise effect
Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Development and trial of an educational tool to support the accessibility evaluation process
Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility
Developing Hera-FFX for WCAG 2.0
Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility
An educational tool for generating inaccessible page examples based on WCAG 2.0 failures
Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility
A tool to support the web accessibility evaluation process for novices
Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Teaching web accessibility with “contramano” and hera
ICCHP'06 Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The Accessibility Evaluation Assistant (AEA) is a web accessibility knowledge management tool designed specifically to assist novice auditors in conducting an accessibility evaluation. The software incorporates a bespoke structured walkthrough approach designed to guide the auditor through a series of checks based on established accessibility principles with the goal of identifying accessibility barriers. A previous trial examined the effectiveness of the AEA and explored the pedagogical potential of the tool when incorporated into the undergraduate computing curriculum. The results of the evaluations carried out by the novices yielded promising levels of validity and reliability. This paper presents the results of a second experiment designed to test the overall efficacy of the AEA when compared to a WCAG 2.0 conformance review. The results of evaluations produced using both AEA and Conformance Review methods were examined and comparisons made of quality factors such as effectiveness, reliability, efficiency and usefulness. Quantitative and qualitative data from the experiment support continued use of the AEA in an educational context, highlighting the benefits compared to WCAG 2.0 and gives further insight into the complex nature of developing accessibility evaluation skills in novices.