Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Dynamic speedometer: dashboard redesign to discourage drivers from speeding
CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The Sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Why we tag: motivations for annotation in mobile and online media
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Communications of the ACM
Nugget discovery in visual exploration environments by query consolidation
Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management
Towards Deeper Understanding of Persuasion in Software and Information Systems
ACHI '08 Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction
Information Visualization - Special issue on visual analytics science and technology
Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization
Information Visualization
Building and applying a human cognition model for visual analytics
Information Visualization
Concept maps: integrating knowledge and information visualization
Knowledge and Information Visualization
| Hi-index | 0.01 |
Subtle changes in analysis system interfaces can be used purposely to alter users' analytic behaviors. In a controlled study subjects completed three analyses at one-week intervals using an analysis support system. Control subjects used one interface in all sessions. Test subjects used modified versions in the last two sessions: a first set of changes aimed at increasing subjects' use of the system and their consideration of alternative hypotheses; a second set of changes aimed at increasing the amount of evidence collected. Results show that in the second session test subjects used the interface 39% more and switched between hypotheses 19% more than in the first session. They then collected 26% more evidence in the third than in the second session. These increases differ significantly (p