Benchmarking for large-scale placement and beyond
Proceedings of the 2003 international symposium on Physical design
Lower Bounds on the Loading of Multiple Bus Networks for Binary Tree Algorithms
IEEE Transactions on Computers
IBM Journal of Research and Development - POWER5 and packaging
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
Cluster based dynamic area-array I/O planning for flip chip technology
Microelectronic Engineering
| Hi-index | 0.04 |
We empirically assess the implications of fixed terminals for hypergraph partitioning heuristics. Our experimental testbed incorporates a leading-edge multilevel hypergraph partitioner and IBM-internal circuits that have recently been released as part of the ISPD-98 Benchmark Suite. We find that the presence of fixed terminals can make a partitioning instance considerably easier (possibly to the point of being “trivial”); much less effort is needed to stably reach solution qualities that are near best-achievable. Toward development of partitioning heuristics specific to the fixed-terminals regime, we study the pass statistics of flat FM-based partitioning heuristics. Our data suggest that more fixed terminals implies that the improvements within a pass will more likely occur near the beginning of the pass. Restricting the length of passes-which degrades solution quality in the classic (free-hypergraph) context-is relatively safe for the fixed-terminals regime and considerably reduces the run times of our FM-based heuristic implementations. The distinct nature of partitioning in the fixed-terminals regime has deep implications: (1) for the design and use of partitioners in top-down placement; (2) for the context in which VLSI hypergraph partitioning research is pursued; and (3) for the development of new benchmark instances for the research community