Design of human-centric adaptive multimodal interfaces

  • Authors:

  • J. Kong;W. Y. Zhang;N. Yu;X. J. Xia

  • Affiliations:

  • North Dakota State University, United States;North Dakota State University, United States;North Dakota State University, United States;North Dakota State University, United States

  • Venue:
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Multimodal interfaces have attracted more and more attention. Most researches focus on each interaction mode independently and then fuse information at the application level. Recently, several frameworks and models have been proposed to support the design and development of multimodal interfaces. However, it is challenging to provide automatic modality adaptation in multimodal interfaces. Existing approaches are using rule-based specifications to define the adaptation of input/output modalities. Rule-based specifications have the problems of completeness and coherence. Distinct from previous work, this paper presents a novel approach that quantifies the user preference of each modality and considers the adaptation as an optimization issue that searches for a set of input/output modalities matching user's preference. Our approach applies a cross-layer design, which considers the adaptation from the perspectives of the interaction context, available system resources, and QoS requirements. Furthermore, our approach supports human-centric adaptation. A user can report the preference of a modality so that selected modalities fit user's personal needs. An optimal solution and a heuristic algorithm have been developed to automatically select an appropriate set of modality combinations under a specific situation. We have designed a framework based on the heuristic algorithm and existing ontology, and applied the framework to conduct a utility evaluation, in which we have employed a within-subject experiment. Fifty participants were invited to go through three scenarios and compare automatically selected modalities with randomly selected modalities. The results from the experiment show that users perceived the automatically selected modalities as appropriate and satisfactory.