Efficient Constrained Video Coding for Low Complexity Decoding
ICIAR '08 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Image Analysis and Recognition
A Multi-core Architecture Based Parallel Framework for H.264/AVC Deblocking Filters
Journal of Signal Processing Systems
Parallel Scalability of Video Decoders
Journal of Signal Processing Systems
Video coding with low-complexity directional adaptive interpolation filters
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Methods for Power/Throughput/Area Optimization of H.264/AVC Decoding
Journal of Signal Processing Systems
An end-to-end application system of AVS: AVS-IPTV in China
PCM'07 Proceedings of the multimedia 8th Pacific Rim conference on Advances in multimedia information processing
The new memory-efficient hardware architecture of CAVLD in H.264/AVC for mobile system
ISCIT'09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Communications and information technologies
VLSI implementation of sub-pixel interpolator for AVS encoder
LSMS/ICSEE'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Life system modeling and simulation and intelligent computing, and 2010 international conference on Intelligent computing for sustainable energy and environment: Part II
Encoder adaptable difference detection for low power video compression in surveillance system
PCM'10 Proceedings of the Advances in multimedia information processing, and 11th Pacific Rim conference on Multimedia: Part II
ESVD: an integrated energy scalable framework for low-power video decoding systems
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking - Special issue on multimedia communications over next generation wireless networks
Multithreading architecture for real-time MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 SVC decoder
PSIVT'11 Proceedings of the 5th Pacific Rim conference on Advances in Image and Video Technology - Volume Part II
Hi-index | 0.00 |
An analysis of computational complexity is presented for an H.26L video decoder, based on extensive experiments on a general-purpose processor. In addition, platform-independent techniques to optimize an H.26L decoder implementation are given. Comparisons are carried out between our highly optimized version of H.26L, the public reference implementation of H.26L, and a highly optimized H.263+ implementation. Both QCIF and CIF-sized image sequences are used. The results show that with equal visual quality, the bit-rate savings range from 28% to 58%, while the frame decoding speed of H.26L is about 11% better than that of a highly optimized H.263+.