Information architectures: methods and practice
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
A framework for information systems architecture
IBM Systems Journal
Systems planning for the enterprise-wide information management complex: the architectural approach
Journal of Management Information Systems
Managing the data resource: a contingency perspective
MIS Quarterly
Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture
IBM Systems Journal
Strategic data planning: lessons from the field
MIS Quarterly
Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology
Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology
Shaping the future: business design through information technology
Shaping the future: business design through information technology
Reengineering: business change of mythic proportions?
MIS Quarterly
After reengineering: taking care of business
Datamation
The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data
ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) - Special issue: papers from the international conference on very large data bases: September 22–24, 1975, Framingham, MA
A relational model of data for large shared data banks
Communications of the ACM
Strategic Data Planning Method
Strategic Data Planning Method
Data Base Management
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Business process redesign (BPR) and information architecture (IA) have been recognized as high priority agenda items in organizations during the 1990s. This paper explores the relationships between the two concepts. Specifically, this paper focuses on three main concerns: how IA supports BPR, how the lack of IA hinders BPR, and what approach to IA can facilitate BPR? The paper begins with a brief review of the development and implementation of each concept. This is followed by an examination of how IA and BPR are related to business processes, both existing and newly designed processes. This analysis, in conjunction with results from field research, provide the basis for nine propositions regarding the BPR and IA relationship. In support of BPR, IS professionals have the opportunity not only to contribute to a firm's business objectives, but also to begin to achieve IA's promise while avoiding some of IA's past implementation problems. It is hoped that further research based on these propositions will lead to more complete answers and perhaps more specific questions on the BPR/IA relationships.