Data structures and network algorithms
Data structures and network algorithms
Generalized best-first search strategies and the optimality of A*
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Toward Reference Models for Requirements Traceability
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Maintaining traceability links during object-oriented software evolution
Software—Practice & Experience
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
The 4+1 View Model of Architecture
IEEE Software
Similarity Flooding: A Versatile Graph Matching Algorithm and Its Application to Schema Matching
ICDE '02 Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering
A standard for architecture description
IBM Systems Journal
Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives
Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives
Bayesian Approaches to Matching Architectural Diagrams
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Architectural modeling has advised many domain-specific notations, where as each one focus on a specific application domain, analysis type, or modeling environment. In IT industry, a system architecture and structured artifacts are represented by using some informal diagrams and formal models. A software architect was not affirmed by his own language/tool and has to model a bear on, and he has to manually transform the accessible architectural specification into the required language/tool. We configured a framework based on Comparison of Greedy Search and Ammolite algorithms, which can cardinally finds the correspondence architecture models/diagrams. By keeping it in practice, the Darwin/FSP ADL and to a UML2.0 profile for software architectures we apply the M2MC approach. This brings assembled various contexts through a common semantic core, called A0. It performs different individual matches such as pairwise, Split-Merge and Drop match and then combines all matches together to design an ADL model. To rate the quality candidates for every ADL model it has some correspondence score. To find best Correspondence among the given ADL models uses different search Algorithms.