What you look at is what you get: eye movement-based interaction techniques
CHI '90 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Integration and synchronization of input modes during multimodal human-computer interaction
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems
“Put-that-there”: Voice and gesture at the graphics interface
SIGGRAPH '80 Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
Where is "it"? Event Synchronization in Gaze-Speech Input Systems
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Multimodal interfaces
Speech-augmented eye gaze interaction with small closely spaced targets
Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
Reducing shoulder-surfing by using gaze-based password entry
Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on Usable privacy and security
Integrated speech and gaze control for realistic desktop environments
Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
"Move the couch where?": developing an augmented reality multimodal interface
ISMAR '06 Proceedings of the 5th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality
GazeSpace: eye gaze controlled content spaces
BCS-HCI '07 Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI...but not as we know it - Volume 2
Teleoperation through eye gaze (TeleGaze): a multimodal approach
ROBIO'09 Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on Robotics and biomimetics
Multimodal, touchless interaction in spatial augmented reality environments
ICDHM'11 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Digital human modeling
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents an experiment that was conducted to investigate gaze combined with voice commands. There has been very little research about the design of voice commands for this kind of input. It is not known yet if users prefer longer sentences like in natural dialogues or short commands. In the experiment three different voice commands are compared during a simple task in which participants had to drag & drop, rotate, and resize objects. It turned out that the shortness of a voice command -- in terms of number of words -- is more important than it being absolutely natural. Participants preferred the voice command with the fewest words and the fewest syllables. For the voice commands which had the same number of syllables, the users also preferred the one with the fewest words, even though there were no big differences in time and errors.