On total functions, existence theorems and computational complexity
Theoretical Computer Science
On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence
Journal of Computer and System Sciences - Special issue: 31st IEEE conference on foundations of computer science, Oct. 22–24, 1990
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness
On the Complexity of Two-PlayerWin-Lose Games
FOCS '05 Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
The approximation complexity of win-lose games
SODA '07 Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
Settling the complexity of computing two-player Nash equilibria
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
The Complexity of Computing a Nash Equilibrium
SIAM Journal on Computing
On the computational complexity of Nash equilibria for (0,1) bimatrix games
Information Processing Letters
Complexity of rational and irrational Nash equilibria
SAGT'11 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Algorithmic game theory
On the complexity of approximating a Nash equilibrium
Proceedings of the twenty-second annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We revisit the complexity of deciding, given a (finite) strategic game, whether Nash equilibria with certain natural properties exist; such decision problems are well-known to be $\cal NP$-complete [2, 6, 10] . We show that this complexity remains unchanged when all utilities are restricted to be 0 or 1; thus, win-lose games are as complex as general games with respect to such decision problems.