Inventing accuracy: a historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance
Inventing accuracy: a historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance
An affective guide robot in a shopping mall
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction
Hospital robot at work: something alien or an intelligent colleague?
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Psychology of user experience in a collaborative video-conference system
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Affect misattribution procedure: an implicit technique to measure user experience in hri
HRI '12 Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
Effect of scenario media on human-robot interaction evaluation
HRI '12 Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
Navigating in public space: participants' evaluation of a robot's approach behavior
HRI '12 Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
HRI '12 Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
Hi-index | 0.00 |
It is the aim of this paper to show on a meta-level how studies in public places can contribute to positively influence people's attitude towards robots. By means of examining objective and subjective data gathered in the lab and data from field studies, it will be shown how people's experiences with a robot outside the sheltering laboratory surroundings can help to value robots more positively. We argue, that studies in public places can serve as a means to enable many people with hands-on experiences and as proof-of-concept evaluation for researchers. We contrasted people's explicit ratings of our robots and although the differences are rather subtle, they nevertheless reveal a tendency for the positive effect of field studies in public places. Additionally, we contrasted people's implicit attitude towards robots which could support our assumption that people who interacted with robots in the field rate it significantly better than people who interacted with it in the lab.