The growing risks of information systems success
MIS Quarterly
Information and Management
Aligning MIS with the business goals
Information and Management
A cross-cultural comparison of IS designer values
Communications of the ACM
Key issues in information systems management: an international perspective
Information and Management
Managing I/S design teams: a control theories perspective
Management Science
Prototyping: a metaphor for cross-cultural transfer and implementation of IS applications
Information and Management
IS project team performance: an empirical assessment
Information and Management
Critical issues in abandoned information systems development projects
Communications of the ACM
Information management as perceived by CIOs in three pacific rim countries
Journal of Global Information Management
Journal of Global Information Management
IS project characteristics and performance: a Kuwaiti illustration
Journal of Global Information Management
Key recurrent issues in the MIS implementation process *
MIS Quarterly
Information systems strategies for multinational companies in Arab Gulf countries
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals
Testing alternative models of individuals' social media involvement and satisfaction
Computers in Human Behavior
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This study examined the perceptions of Information Systems IS developers from the U.S. and Korea with regards to the strategies that are considered crucial for IS success. The results of a principal component analysis revealed that the IS development strategies could be classified into four categories: 1 Organizational Integration, 2 Team Member Characteristics, 3 Project Leader Traits, and 4 Project Development Management. ANOVA results indicated that developers from both countries viewed Organizational Integration as the most important component and Project Development Management as the least important component. However, while IS developers in the U.S. viewed Team Member Characteristics as the second most important component, Korean IS developers rated the Project Leader Traits as the second most important component. Moreover, the IS developers from the U.S. rated Organizational Integration and Team Member Characteristics as significantly more important than did the IS developers from Korea. The results were discussed in terms of Hofstede's model of national culture.