How people assess cooperatively authored information resources

Authors:
Andrea Forte;Thomas Park
Affiliations:
Drexel University, Chestnut, Philadelphia, PA;Drexel University, Chestnut, Philadelphia, PA
Venue:
Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration
Year:
2012

Citing 8
Cited 0

What makes Web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context

Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Visualizing activity on wikipedia with chromograms

INTERACT'07 Proceedings of the 11th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part II
WikiChanges: exposing Wikipedia revision activity

WikiSym '08 Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikis
Assigning trust to Wikipedia content

WikiSym '08 Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikis

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This work in progress highlights late-breaking results and foreshadows opportunities for designing interfaces that help support credibility assessment of cooperatively authored information resources.