Information Systems Research
Specification approaches express different world hypotheses
IWSSD '93 Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on Software specification and design
Characterizing E-Participation in Policy-Making
HICSS '04 Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 5 - Volume 5
A framework for scoping eParticipation
dg.o '07 Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Digital government research: bridging disciplines & domains
A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools
HICSS '07 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives
Communications of the ACM - Surviving the data deluge
eParticipation: The Research Gaps
ePart '09 Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Electronic Participation
The behavior chain for online participation: how successful web services structure persuasion
PERSUASIVE'07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Persuasive technology
Groundswell, Expanded and Revised Edition: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies
Groundswell, Expanded and Revised Edition: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies
Reflecting on E-Government Research: Toward a Taxonomy of Theories and Theoretical Constructs
International Journal of Electronic Government Research
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
A proliferation of e-participation research in recent years has produced fragmented contributions in the area of e-participation models. Without a mechanism for analyzing, relating and consolidating these models, further development of the domain is in danger of repeating itself. This paper presents such a mechanism -- an Integrative Framework which organizes e-participation models based on the nature and specific aspects of e-participation supported. The Integrative Framework enables mapping of models to 12 different facets constructed from a combination of three related perspectives and four canonical aspects of e-participation. While our genealogical analysis of the models showed in general weak relationships among models, our Framework enabled logical groupings of these models as a basis for consolidation, alignment or complementarity analyses. Mappings also clearly revealed aspects of e-participation that are yet to be (sufficiently) addressed. We conclude with recommendations for fostering rigorous and incremental model development in the e-participation domain.