A Calibration-Free Gaze Tracking Technique
ICPR '00 Proceedings of the International Conference on Pattern Recognition - Volume 4
Implicit Calibration of a Remote Gaze Tracker
CVPRW '04 Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'04) Volume 8 - Volume 08
A robust 3D eye gaze tracking system using noise reduction
Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
Taxonomic study of polynomial regressions applied to the calibration of video-oculographic systems
Proceedings of the 2008 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications
In the Eye of the Beholder: A Survey of Models for Eyes and Gaze
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
An eye-gaze input system using information on eye movement history
UAHCI'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Universal access in human-computer interaction: ambient interaction
A new mapping function to improve the accuracy of a video-based eye tracker
Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In a video-based eye tracker the pupil-glint vector changes as the eyes move. Using an appropriate model, the pupil-glint vector can be mapped to coordinates of the point of regard (PoR). Using a simple hardware configuration with one camera and one infrared source, the accuracy that can be achieved with various mapping models is compared with one another. No single model proved to be the best for all participants. It was also found that the arrangement and number of calibration targets has a significant effect on the accuracy that can be achieved with the said hardware configuration. A mapping model is proposed that provides reasonably good results for all participants provided that a calibration set with at least 8 targets is used. It was shown that although a large number of calibration targets (18) provide slightly better accuracy than a smaller number of targets (8), the improvement might not be worth the extra effort during a calibration session.