Tractable inference systems: an extension with a deducibility predicate

  • Authors:
  • Hubert Comon-Lundh;Véronique Cortier;Guillaume Scerri

  • Affiliations:
  • LSV, CNRS & ENS Cachan, France;LORIA, CNRS, France;LSV, CNRS & ENS Cachan, France,LORIA, CNRS, France

  • Venue:
  • CADE'13 Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Automated Deduction
  • Year:
  • 2013

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The main contribution of the paper is a PTIME decision procedure for the satisfiability problem in a class of first-order Horn clauses. Our result is an extension of the tractable classes of Horn clauses of Basin & Ganzinger in several respects. For instance, our clauses may contain atomic formulas S⊢t where ⊢ is a predicate symbol and S is a finite set of terms instead of a term. ⊢ is used to represent any possible computation of an attacker, given a set of messages S. The class of clauses that we consider encompasses the clauses designed by Bana & Comon-Lundh for security proofs of protocols in a computational model. Because of the (variadic) ⊢ predicate symbol, we cannot use ordered resolution strategies only, as in Basin & Ganzinger: given S⊢t, we must avoid computing S′⊢t for all subsets S′ of S. Instead, we design PTIME entailment procedures for increasingly expressive fragments, such procedures being used as oracles for the next fragment. Finally, we obtain a PTIME procedure for arbitrary ground clauses and saturated Horn clauses (as in Basin & Ganzinger), together with a particular class of (non saturated) Horn clauses with the ⊢ predicate and constraints (which are necessary to cover the application).