An assessment of equivalence between paper and social media surveys: The role of social desirability and satisficing

  • Authors:
  • Jiaming Fang;Chao Wen;Victor Prybutok

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Management Science and E-business, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China;School of Business, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, USA;Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, USA

  • Venue:
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Year:
  • 2014

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Investigation of the underlying mechanisms responsible for measurement variance has received little attention. The primary objective of this study is to examine whether paper and social media surveys produce convergent results and investigate the underlying psychological mechanisms for the potential measurement nonequivalence. Particularly, we explored the role of social desirability and satisficing on the measurement results. We collected data via five different survey modes, including paper survey, ad hoc Web survey, online forum (message boards)-based, SNS-based and microblog-based surveys. The findings show that socially desirable responding does not lead to inconsistent results. Rather we found that satisficing causes inconsistent results in paper versus online surveys. Sociability reduces the possibility of engaging in satisficing that results in inconsistent results between traditional Web surveys and social media-based Web surveys.