On approaches to the study of social issues in computing

  • Authors:
  • Abbe Mowshowitz

  • Affiliations:
  • Graduate School of Management, Delft, The Netherlands

  • Venue:
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Year:
  • 1981

Quantified Score

Hi-index 48.27

Visualization

Abstract

This paper identifies and analyzes technical and nontechnical biases in research on social issues in computing. Five positions—technicism, progressive individualism, elitism, pluralism, and radical criticism—which reflect major streams of contemporary social thought are examined. The analysis of positions documents the close relationship between research and policy formation and reveals the misleading and dangerous character of the presumption of scholarly objectivity in research on social issues.