Programming pedagogy—a psychological overview
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
Foundations of computer science: what are they and how do we teach them?
ITiCSE '96 Proceedings of the 1st conference on Integrating technology into computer science education
The effects of partially-individualized assignments on subsequent student performance
SIGCSE '98 Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
WWW-based presentations as a complementary part of conventional lectures in the basic of informatics
ITiCSE '98 Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on the teaching of computing and the 3rd annual conference on Integrating technology into computer science education: Changing the delivery of computer science education
The effect of previous software development experience on understanding the object-oriented paradigm
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching
ITiCSE '05 Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Bridging the conceptual gap: assessing the impact on student attitudes toward programming
Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
ICER '09 Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on Computing education research workshop
Task analysis, usability and engagement
HCI'07 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human-computer interaction: interaction design and usability
Comparison of OOP first and OOP later: first results regarding the role of comfort level
Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents results of a student survey which investigates factors affecting student impressions of non-introductory elective computing subjects. The surveys were completed by students in several selected subjects in the last week of semester, prior to them completing their final exam. The factors investigated include students' reason's for taking the surveyed subjects, their expected final result and their opinions on the subject assessment requirements and the quality of teaching. The results indicate there are strong relationships between students' motivations and their impression of subjects. We suggest that in addition to focusing on quality teaching, educators should ensure that their subjects are meeting students' motivational requirements.