Linear time algorithms for visibility and shortest path problems inside simple polygons
SCG '86 Proceedings of the second annual symposium on Computational geometry
Geometric applications of a matrix searching algorithm
SCG '86 Proceedings of the second annual symposium on Computational geometry
Optimal shortest path queries in a simple polygon
SCG '87 Proceedings of the third annual symposium on Computational geometry
An O (n log log n)-time algorithm for triangulating a simple polygon
SIAM Journal on Computing
Visibility and intersectin problems in plane geometry
SCG '85 Proceedings of the first annual symposium on Computational geometry
Fast Triangulation of Simple Polygons
Proceedings of the 1983 International FCT-Conference on Fundamentals of Computation Theory
Optimal shortest path queries in a simple polygon
SCG '87 Proceedings of the third annual symposium on Computational geometry
The furthest-site geodesic Voronoi diagram
SCG '88 Proceedings of the fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry
Computing the eccentricity transform of a polygonal shape
CIARP'07 Proceedings of the Congress on pattern recognition 12th Iberoamerican conference on Progress in pattern recognition, image analysis and applications
Euclidean eccentricity transform by discrete arc paving
DGCI'08 Proceedings of the 14th IAPR international conference on Discrete geometry for computer imagery
The geodesic diameter of polygonal domains
ESA'10 Proceedings of the 18th annual European conference on Algorithms: Part I
Discrete Applied Mathematics
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We present an &Ogr;(n logn) time and &Ogr; (n) space algorithm for the following problem in a simple polygon P with n vertices: For each vertex u of P, find another vertex &pgr;(u) that is furthest from u, where the distance between two points is measured by the length of the shortest internal path connecting them in P. As a corollary, the longest internal path in P, called the geodesic diameter, also can be found within the same time and space bound. All the previously known algorithms for computing the geodesic diameter have required &OHgr;(n2) time in the worst case, e.g. see Chazelle [5], Reif and Storer [16] and Toussaint [19].