Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) - Special issue on social science perspectives on IS
From documents to discourse: shifting conceptions of scholarly publishing
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Anchored conversations: chatting in the context of a document
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) - Special issue on human-computer interaction in the new millennium, Part 2
The digital library for earth system education: building community, building the library
Communications of the ACM
Community design of DLESE's collections review policy: a technological frames analysis
Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
An algorithm for automated rating of reviewers
Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
Writing Effective Use Cases
Extending the role of the digital library: computer support for creating articles
Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia
The dynamic review journal: a scholarly archive
The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia - Special issue: Scholarly hypermedia
A grid services implementation for a virtual research environment
ELeGI'05 Proceedings of the 1st international ELeGI conference on Advanced Technology for Enhanced Learning
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Review of digital educational resources, such as course modules, simulations, and data analysis tools, can differ from review of scholarly articles, in the heterogeneity and complexity of the resources themselves. The Partnership Review Model, as demonstrated in two cases, appears to promote cooperative interactions between distributed resource reviewers, enabling reviewers to effectively divide up the task of reviewing complex resources with little explicit coordination. The shared structural outline of the resource made visible in the review environment enables participants to monitor other reviewers' actions and to thus target their efforts accordingly. This reviewing approach may be effective in educational digital libraries that depend on community volunteers for most of their reviewing.