Who should teach computer ethics and computers & society?
ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
Integrating ethical content into computing curricula
ACE '04 Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 30
A method of automatic grade calibration in peer assessment
ACE '05 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 42
XP practices applied to grading
Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Facing the challenges of teaching IT ethics
Proceedings of the 7th conference on Information technology education
Engaging undergraduates in discussions about ethics in computing
ACE '07 Proceedings of the ninth Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 66
Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education
How rubrics that measure outcomes can complete the assessment loop
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Students in computer ethics-speak up
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Beyond good and evil impacts: rethinking the social issues components in our computing curricula
Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Considering rigor and relevance when evaluating test driven development: A systematic review
Information and Software Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Computer ethics courses differ from technical courses in the manner in which they are taught and assessed. A common assignment in a computer ethics course is to write an essay that addresses a technical dilemma. Computer science faculty typically do not have training or experience in grading essays. The purpose of this paper is to present a scoring rubric that has been successfully used to grade and track students' knowledge development as they progress through a computer ethics course. Although this paper focuses upon a specific rubric, general principles will be emphasized to show how scoring rubrics can be used across different courses.