Evaluating the CMM Level 3 KPA of Intergroup Coordination: A theory-based approach

  • Authors:
  • Kay M. Nelson;Deb Armstrong;Mari Buche;Mehdi Ghods

  • Affiliations:
  • David Eccles School of Business, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA E-mail: actknebusiness@utah.edu;Division of Accounting and Information Systems, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66044, USA E-mail: &lcub/darmstrong&semi/mbuche&rcub/@ukans.edu;Division of Accounting and Information Systems, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66044, USA E-mail: &lcub/darmstrong&semi/mbuche&rcub/@ukans.edu;The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA 98124, USA E-mail: mehdi.ghods@boeing.com

  • Venue:
  • Information Technology and Management
  • Year:
  • 2000

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper examines the Intergroup Coordination key process area (KPA) for theoretical significance and measurability. The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) has developed a framework called the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) which enables organizations to measure their “maturity” in doing software engineering. The CMM is not theoretically derived. It is, however, a result of years of anecdotal evidence collected from practitioners. This paper compares the Intergroup Coordination KPA to the body of literature on coordination and measures it using theoretically derived determinants. These determinants are then evaluated for possible relationships to productivity factors that indicate business process support.