Software quality and the Capability Maturity Model
Communications of the ACM
Process assessment considered wasteful
Communications of the ACM
Knowledge capability and maturity in software management
ACM SIGMIS Database - Special issue on infomration systems: current issues and future changes
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Evaluating the CMM Level 3 KPA of Intergroup Coordination: A theory-based approach
Information Technology and Management
Bottom-up Process Improvement Tricks
IEEE Software
Software Processes: Live and Let Die
IEEE Software
Transition Management of Software Process Improvement
PROFES '02 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement
The effects of development team skill on software product quality
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
Is agility out there?: agile practices in game development
Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
Influence of human factors in software quality and productivity
ICCSA'11 Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Computational science and Its applications - Volume Part V
A lightweight framework for describing software practices
Journal of Systems and Software
Simple indicators for tracking software process improvement progress
EuroSPI'06 Proceedings of the 13th European conference on Software Process Improvement
Prescription, description, reflection: the shape of the software process improvement field
International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals
EuroSPI'07 Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Software Process Improvement
| Hi-index | 0.03 |
All software managers are faced with three P's when software is to be built: people, problem, and process. Should each of the three P's be given equal weight? Should one be elevated to a more important role than the others? Are managers focusing too much attention on the wrong P? The author offers answers to these questions and argues in favour of software heroism