Cyc: toward programs with common sense
Communications of the ACM
The computer model of the mind
Thinking (vol. 3)
Enabling agents to work together
Communications of the ACM
CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure
Communications of the ACM
Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (Better) Lovelace Test
Minds and Machines
The Cartesian Test for Automatism1
Minds and Machines
Look Who's Moving the Goal Posts Now
Minds and Machines
Passing Loebner's Turing Test: A Case of Conflicting Discourse Functions1
Minds and Machines
Minds and Machines
Turing's Two Tests for Intelligence*
Minds and Machines
Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game
Minds and Machines
Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test1
Minds and Machines
A Lecture and Two Radio Broadcasts on Machine Intelligence by Alan Turing
Machine Intelligence 15, Intelligent Agents [St. Catherine's College, Oxford, July 1995]
Turing''s Test and Conscious Thought
Turing''s Test and Conscious Thought
Turing test considered harmful
IJCAI'95 Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1
The Turing Test: Verbal Behavior as the Hallmark of Intelligence edited by Stuart Shieber
Computational Linguistics
The interrogator as critic: The turing test and the evaluation of generative music systems
Computer Music Journal
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
The standard interpretation of the imitation game is defended over the rival gender interpretation though it is noted that Turing himself proposed several variations of his imitation game. The Turing test is then justified as an inductive test not as an operational definition as commonly suggested. Turing's famous prediction about his test being passed at the 70% level is disconfirmed by the results of the Loebner 2000 contest and the absence of any serious Turing test competitors from AI on the horizon. But, reports of the death of the Turing test and AI are premature. AI continues to flourish and the test continues to play an important philosophical role in AI. Intelligence attribution, methodological, and visionary arguments are given in defense of a continuing role for the Turing test. With regard to Turing's predictions one is disconfirmed, one is confirmed, but another is still outstanding.