Comparing, Contrasting ISO 9001 and the SEI Capability Maturity Model

Authors:
R. C. Bamford;W. J. Deibler, II
Affiliations:
-;-
Venue:
Computer
Year:
1993

Citing 1
Cited 6

Characterizing the Software Process: A Maturity Framework

IEEE Software

A study of two frameworks for quality software process

SAC '95 Proceedings of the 1995 ACM symposium on Applied computing
A Taxonomy to Compare SPI Frameworks

EWSPT '01 Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Software Process Technology
The impact of software process improvement on quality: in theory and practice

Information and Management
A unified model for the implementation of both ISO 9001:2000 and CMMI by ISO-certified organizations

Journal of Systems and Software - Special issue: Selected papers from the 11th Asia Pacific software engineering conference (APSEC 2004)
A fuzzy decision support for the selection of information system outsourcing company

ICS'06 Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on Systems
Measuring Critical Factors of Software Quality Management: Development and Validation of an Instrument

Information Resources Management Journal

Quantified Score

Hi-index	4.10

Visualization

Abstract

The Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institutes's (SEI's) five-level framework for engineering practices in a successful software development organization and the International Organization for Standardization's ISO 9000 series of standards, which describes the key requirements for companies and organizations doing business in the European Community, are reviewed. The origins of the models are discussed, and the two models are compared and contrasted.