Phase tracking: what do we gain from optimality? particle filtering versus phase-locked loops

  • Authors:

  • P. O. Amblard;J. M. Brossier;E. Moisan

  • Affiliations:

  • Laboratoire des Images et des Signaux Groupe nonlinéaire, UMR CNRS 5083, ENSIEG, BP46, 38402 Saint-Martin d'Hères cedex, France;ST-Microelectronics, AST Grenoble Lab, 12 rue Jules Horowitz, 38019 Grenoble cedex, France;Laboratoire des Images et des Signaux Groupe nonlinéaire, UMR CNRS 5083, ENSIEG, BP46, 38402 Saint-Martin d'Hères cedex, France

  • Venue:
  • Signal Processing
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.09

Visualization

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of tracking a Brownian phase with linear drift observed to within one digital modulation and one additive white Gaussian noise. This problem is of great importance as it models the problem of carrier synchronization in digital communications. The ultimate performances achievable for this problem are evaluated and are compared to the performances of three solutions of the problem. The optimal filter cannot be explicitly calculated and one goal of the paper is to implement it using recent sequential Monte-Carlo techniques known as particle filtering. This approach is compared to more traditional loops such as the Costas loop and the decision feedback loop. Moreover, since the phase has a linear drift, the loops considered are second-order loops. To make fair comparisons, we exploit all the known information to put the loops in their best configurations (optimal step sizes of the loops). We show that asymptotically, the loops and the particle filter are equivalent in terms of mean square error. However, using Monte-Carlo simulations we show that the particle filter outperforms the loops when considering the mean acquisition time (convergence rate), and we argue that the particle filter is also better than the loops when dealing with the important problem of mean time between cycle slips.